Noon Talk “Research Data licensing”
February 12th / 12:00-13:00 / Rolex Learning Center
Research Data is a precious good. Where is the balance between protecting it and opening it? How can you manage the way it is reused by others? In this noon talk, the topic of data licensing will be presented from various points of view. After a brief introduction on current practices by EPFL Library, three speakers will share their experience and point of view about research data licensing:
- Giovanni Pizzi (senior scientist and and project leader at NCCR Marvel)
- Jessica Pidoux (PhD student at the Digital Humanities Institute)
- Mauro Lattuada (Technology Transfer Manager at EPFL)
Workshops “Research Data Management: introduction”
[FULL] February 14th / 12:00-13:30 / MED 2 1522
May 9th / 12:00-13:30 / MED 2 1522
In this course, you will get an introduction to the main concepts of Research Data Management to apply them to your specific situation.
Workshops “Research Data Management: from plan to action”
February 27th / 10:00-12:00 / RLC A1 230
March 7th / 10:00-12:00 / RLC A1 230
In this personalized workshop, you will check the consistency of your data management plan (DMP) and how to implement it in your lab.
Meet and discuss with EPFL Library Research Data team
February 11, 13 and 15th / 11:30-13:30 / Rolex Learning Center (entrance)
February 12th / 13:00-15:00 / Rolex Learning Center (entrance)
No registration needed, just come and visit us!
#10 Research Data Management fast guides
Throughout Love Data Week 2019
On the occasion of Love Data Week 2019, EPFL Library launches the first EPFL Fast Guides on Research Data Management (RDM). The complete set will be made available during the Love Data Week, but you can already download the first ones! 😉
|#01 RESEARCH DATA: THE BASICS
#02 FAIR DATA PRINCIPLES
#03 RDM COST
#04 FILE FORMATS
#08 PERSONAL DATA
#09 DATA MASKING
#10 STORAGE, PUBLICATION AND PRESERVATION
The main theme for the 2019 Love Data Week is data in everyday life, that will be explored through two topics – open data and data justice. However, there are many aspects of this theme that may echo more strongly with your local community or organization. We encourage you to adapt and modify!
Stay informed. Click and read our take on the three topics proposed for this year’s edition.
The data dilemma
The impact of data is increasingly felt by anyone with an internet connection or who carries a mobile device. In Switzerland, the forecasted rate of internet user penetration for 2019 is of 78%, in line with the European’s rate of 76%.
This digital penetration is a major driver for a flourishing digital industry, whose companies recently ascended in the top ranking of market value. The digital industry is also set to revolutionize the manufacturing processings, via the so-called Industry 4.0 revolution.
Meanwhile, a visible and yet non-transparent part of the digital industry, able to quantify, aggregate, and sell personal details of our everyday lives, makes its living from personal data. Privacy concerns and many little and big scandals, brought the EU to adopt in 2018 the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): all the main internet actors have tried to adapt to the new regulation, at least in the EU, with methods and results that surely need some improvements.
Top-down & Bottom-up
As technology enables us to easily create, analyze, and share data to improve our daily routine, data pervades our daily lives. However, we are still learning how to adopt (and adapt to) new policies and regulations designed to protect our privacy, as citizens as well as professionals. In Switzerland, a good example of data privacy advocates is a nonprofit organization promoting digital rights, personaldata.io, which participates in the Facebook testimonies following recent scandals.
Of course, the security of data is another topic related to our daily use of phones, TVs, computers, connected refrigerators, routers, cloud storage accounts, social apps, etc. For instance, at the beginning of 2019 a huge data breach of 772 million emails addresses has already been exposed. Clearly, the data protection in everyday life is not just about regulations, but a necessary cultural shift towards practices (password manager, 2-step authentication, biometrics authentication, etc.), along with large scale education on what one can or cannot share online.
Beyond the academia
It’s impossible to completely separate new, arising business models in the digital industry, from topics like Open Data or Data Justice. Academic institutions are and should stay at the forefront of this change, by making research robust, accessible and reusable.
For instance, the EPFL proposed different events, initiatives and trainings, with a focus on the media sector (especially fake news, data journalism, content personalization, AI, IoT, etc.) and Open Science. Also, the EPFL Research Data team accompany researchers into managing their data life cycle, the Technology Transfer Office advise thoroughly on the data licensing questions, and the Research Office assists with legal advice via the Research Ethics Assessment.
Funding initiatives, better policies, or even powerful technical tools are useless without ideas dissemination and public awareness. That’s why universities like the EPFL participate to the Love Data Week initiative, with the ultimate goal of making the discussion percolate into many domains, as Open government data, Open software companies, publishing industry, etc.
While open-source software (OSS) seems bound to take over the cloud and the global market, the topic of Open Data is slowly but certainly reaching the same level of awareness. Taiwan, France, Italy, Spain and Colombia lead the way in interest for this topic (as ranked by Google search queries). As its adoption grows, a variety of academic and commercial use cases are monitored, and mapped,.
But Open Data is still failing to become similarly discussed in the literature. Maybe it depends on a fundamental confusion that still exists: its definition. The European Commission defines Open data as “data that anyone can access, use and share”, while the Open Knowledge International organization distinguishes the gratuitousness from the openness, as “Open data and content can be freely used, modified, and shared by anyone for any purpose”.
Why researchers should care
The European Commission clearly wants to leverage on Open Data envisioning a so-called Digital Single Market, and wants it to become common sense in the researchers’ communities. But the first time many researchers confront with this topic is when writing the Data Management Plan (DMP) for funding requests. General concepts (eg. transparency, social or scientific values) are the usually listed as main drivers, but the long-term impact of Open Data is still unknown. Only recently it is making the jump from the policymakers to the higher education institutions and, in most cases, the right policies are not yet in place, as the Open Data Barometer reports.
Real-world examples exist for Open Data use: the Human Genome Project is probably the best-known, good example in which an openly accessible data repository is being used successfully. Morever, the Open Data becomes fundamental for Reproducibility Projects as in Cancer Biology or Psychology. Open Data also promises to reduce research costs, with a 15% savings for projects using it to make research robust, accessible and reusable.
In addition, Open Data are easier to harvest and can make pulished results more easily discovered, with 20-50% more citation for articles linked to associated data. This is technically possible by relying on data repositories discoverable via services like re3data.org, or data search engines like Discover Mendeley Data, Datahub, the European Union Open Data Portal, Google Dataset Search, etc.
As open as possible, as closed as necessary
Even if the Open Access publication of articles has sharply augmented in recent years, Open Data is sometimes subject to academic controversies and over one-third of researchers (36%) rarely or never make their datasets openly available.
Nevertheless, closed (or private) data have many, well-known issues. For instance, the use of closed data typically requires agreements on lengthy and complex terms and conditions, intricate access rights, restrictions about the storage, complex firewall technicalities, etc. Finally, proprietary data services are typically also much more expensive.
The many problems with closed data are reasons for the governments and research funders to enforce more and more Open Data policies, as the European Research Data Pilot or the Swiss Open Research Data policy, two main examples known by the EPFL scientific community.
The data dilemma
Take a minute and think about all the data about you, which you have online.
What kind of data is it? Do you feel it is an accurate representation of yourself, or does it represent only one part of you? Is this the part of you that you want to disclose online and share with the world? Or with the digital industry? Are you the owner of the data about yourself, and do you know how to claim its ownership?
In the context of the Love Data Week, we reflect on these questions by referring to the concept of Data Justice, ie the “datafication in relation to social justice”, to think about how people are made visible or invisible, threatened or empowered, because of their digital lives.
At the EPFL Library, for instance, the exhibition Data Detox shed some light on this topic (content freely downloadable). It clearly explains how and why it is essential to regain control over one’s personal data (digital identity check, cleanup of accounts, tracking cookies, etc.). Other approaches other than detox exist, and the industry is waking up. For instance, initiatives range from the Facebook VPN for kids, or the deep-learning e-assistants like Oyoty of the EPFL Innovation Park, or a paper on Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning in collaboration with Google. Another approach relies on fooling online surveillance: to shift the balance of power between the trackers and the tracked, browser plugins like TrackMeNot or AdNauseam employ different obfuscation strategies.
The decentralization problem
Many projects exist that harness big data or even AI for good,, like crowdAI, or help creating civic campaigns, like the Fight for the Future. But why do they even exist?
Many risks concerning machine learning are recently being highlighted: while they drive the sales of these tech giants, the inherent biases of their algorithms (eg biased training datasets, extremization of suggestions, news rankings, echo-chamber, etc.) are not yet correctly addressed,.
Even neutral, open and community-driven initiatives like Wikipedia struggle with data justice,,,,, showing a polarization might seem contextual, but it is in fact a more general phenomenon. The well-studied rich-get-richer phenomenon persists and, paradoxically, decentralized structures amplify its scale.
The best example is the World Wide Web itself: deviating from its foundational scope of making academic information freely available to anyone, large digital enterprises monopolize the data circulating on it, especially our personal data (eg. Google, Facebook or Amazon in the West,, or Alibaba, Baidu or Tencent in the East).
FAIR data, fair data
In the context of sharing and publishing data, it is import to keep in mind, who will eventually have access to data. But, how to use of the published data as fair and neutral as possible? Context (scientific research, private information, etc.) and documentation (metadata, licensing, etc.) are key, but a critical reflection to share is necessary, for each dataset. That is why knowledgeable policymakers, as well as researchers and scholars, are increasingly pushing for the application of the so-called FAIR principles of datasets, which is to manage data in such a way to make them be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable.
Open Data alone will not solve the issues ultimately related to the way we, humans, want to use data, but it contributes to make the processes more transparent and just at the social scale.
Any other questions?